Latest game
DefeatRanked
SA
IN
YAUpdated 17 hours ago
Steam
JapanC100%
SteamJapanC100%haru
Let's Do This
Last 104–6Last 2011–9
Winrate
54%
20W · 17L · 37 stored
Ranked matches
37
selected mode
Wins
20
Ranked
Losses
17
Ranked
Peak LP
22,126
Yasmine
Ranked LP · Yasmine
League points over time for this character
Not enough ranked LP points in this range yet.
Replay not requested
SAINPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Yasmine
Benchmark refreshed Sep 14, 2026, 10:26 AM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
YALargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | haru | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 25.9% | 9.2% | +16.7% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 43.4% | 29.7% | +13.7% | |
| SA2 | 11.1% | 24.2% | -13.1% | |
| SA1 | 22.2% | 30.9% | -8.7% | |
| Drive Arts | 9.1% | 17.5% | -8.4% | |
| Corner pressure | 7.50 | 13.01 | -5.51 | |
| SA3 | 40.7% | 35.7% | +5.1% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 5.8% | 8.4% | -2.6% | |
| Drive Guard | 16.7% | 14.5% | +2.2% | |
| Time cornered | 7.00 | 9.07 | -2.07 | |
| Drive Parry | 2.90 | 1.90 | +1.00 | |
| Throws | 2.10 | 2.52 | -0.42 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.00 | 0.23 | -0.23 | |
| Got thrown | 2.20 | 2.34 | -0.14 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 1.5% | 1.4% | +0.1% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.08 | |
| Got stunned | 0.00 | 0.06 | -0.06 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.10 | 0.06 | +0.04 | |
| Throw parries | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.03 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.20 | 0.17 | +0.03 | |
| Throw techs | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.02 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.10 | 0.10 | -0.00 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Sagat · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.1 · reference 0.09
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.1 · reference 0.09
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.1 · reference 0.11
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.5% · reference 1.3%
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 2.9 · reference 1.81
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 2.9 · reference 1.81
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 0.74
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 16, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Probe defense before committing
Drive Parry: profile 2.9 · reference 1.81
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 2.9 · reference 1.81
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 0.74
Build pressure without overextending
Corner pressure: profile 7.5 · reference 12.43
Look for chances to gain space with familiar options. Once the opponent is cornered, observe how they actually try to leave before selecting an adjustment.
Try thisTest one pressure sequence you know well. If an escape repeats, rehearse an answer to that exact option; if they vary their defense, avoid committing to a single read.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 7.5 · reference 12.43
- Time cornered: profile 7 · reference 8.88
Adapt to the visible gauge
CA: profile 25.9% · reference 9.1%
Watch current Drive and Super Art resources during the match. Treat the profile’s spending pattern as a question to investigate, not a prediction of burnout or a guaranteed opening.
Try thisAfter a large spend, reassess the options available to both players before approaching. If their resource decisions differ from the profile, follow the live situation.
Supporting stats
- CA: profile 25.9% · reference 9.1%
- SA3: profile 40.7% · reference 39.9%
- Drive Arts: profile 9.1% · reference 16%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 16, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
Yasmine · Latest 100
What to improve
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 7.5 · reference 13.01
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 7.5 · reference 13.01
- Time cornered: profile 7 · reference 9.07
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.17
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.17
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.5% · reference 1.4%
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA2: profile 11.1% · reference 24.2%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA2: profile 11.1% · reference 24.2%
- Drive Arts: profile 9.1% · reference 17.5%
- CA: profile 25.9% · reference 9.2%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 16, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Terry: 9 wins in 26 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Terry: 9 wins in 26 games
- vs Jamie: 9 wins in 19 games
- vs M. Bison: 7 wins in 15 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 16, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free