Latest game
VictoryRanked
ED
KEEDUpdated 1 week ago
Steam
JapanM100%
SteamJapanM100%scarface-NZT
The Standing Man
MR 1,721#19,118Last 105–5+9Last 2010–10+11
Winrate
50%
31W · 31L · 62 stored
Ranked matches
62
selected mode
Wins
31
Ranked
Losses
31
Ranked
Peak MR
1,736
Ed
Ranked MR · Ed
62 local · 0 imported · 62 on chart · 62 battles stored
Replay not requested
EDKEPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Ed
Benchmark refreshed Sep 12, 2026, 10:17 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
EDLargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | scarface-NZT | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA3 | 55.9% | 33.7% | +22.2% | |
| SA1 | 16.2% | 33.3% | -17.2% | |
| SA2 | 17.6% | 23.2% | -5.5% | |
| Corner pressure | 7.40 | 11.75 | -4.35 | |
| Drive Arts | 14.4% | 18.1% | -3.7% | |
| Drive Guard | 15.2% | 12.9% | +2.3% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 5.1% | 6.8% | -1.7% | |
| Drive Parry | 3.60 | 1.92 | +1.68 | |
| Throws | 3.20 | 2.53 | +0.67 | |
| Time cornered | 9.50 | 8.93 | +0.57 | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 34.8% | 35.3% | -0.5% | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 1.2% | 1.7% | -0.5% | |
| CA | 10.3% | 9.8% | +0.5% | |
| Got thrown | 2.60 | 2.20 | +0.40 | |
| Throw techs | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.33 | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.60 | 0.79 | -0.19 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.40 | 0.22 | +0.18 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.10 | 0.22 | -0.12 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.06 | +0.04 | |
| Got stunned | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.10 | 0.14 | -0.04 | |
| Throw parries | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.01 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.10 | 0.10 | -0.00 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ed · Latest 100
What to improve
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.2% · reference 1.5%
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 3.6 · reference 1.77
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 3.6 · reference 1.77
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.4 · reference 0.2
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.6 · reference 0.76
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA1: profile 16.2% · reference 33.1%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA1: profile 16.2% · reference 33.1%
- SA2: profile 17.6% · reference 27.6%
- SA3: profile 55.9% · reference 30%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Luke: 43 wins in 80 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Luke: 43 wins in 80 games
- vs Cammy: 20 wins in 35 games
- vs Elena: 17 wins in 34 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 21 wins in 41 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 21 wins in 41 games
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.2% · reference 1.5%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free