Latest game
VictoryRanked
ED
LUEDUpdated 3 days ago
Steam
JapanC100%
SteamJapanC100%hama
Let's Do This
LP 19,131Last 105–5Last 2011–8
Winrate
58%
11W · 8L · 19 stored
Ranked matches
19
selected mode
Wins
11
Ranked
Losses
8
Ranked
Peak LP
19,131
Ed
Ranked LP · Ed
League points over time for this character
Replay not requested
EDLUPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Ed
Benchmark refreshed Sep 12, 2026, 10:17 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
EDLargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | hama | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA3 | 62.5% | 33.7% | +28.8% | |
| SA1 | 15.6% | 33.3% | -17.7% | |
| SA2 | 6.3% | 23.2% | -16.9% | |
| CA | 15.6% | 9.8% | +5.8% | |
| Corner pressure | 7.10 | 11.75 | -4.65 | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 32.3% | 35.3% | -3.1% | |
| Drive Guard | 10.8% | 12.9% | -2.1% | |
| Throws | 3.90 | 2.53 | +1.37 | |
| Got thrown | 3.30 | 2.20 | +1.10 | |
| Time cornered | 9.90 | 8.93 | +0.97 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 2.4% | 1.7% | +0.7% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.10 | 0.79 | -0.69 | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 6.2% | 6.8% | -0.6% | |
| Drive Impact | 0.50 | 0.22 | +0.28 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.40 | 0.14 | +0.26 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.00 | 0.22 | -0.22 | |
| Drive Parry | 1.70 | 1.92 | -0.22 | |
| Throw techs | 0.40 | 0.53 | -0.13 | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.21 | -0.11 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.20 | 0.10 | +0.10 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.06 | +0.04 | |
| Got stunned | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 | |
| Drive Arts | 18.1% | 18.1% | +0.0% |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ed · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.4 · reference 0.14
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.4 · reference 0.14
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.5 · reference 0.22
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.5 · reference 0.22
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 2.4% · reference 1.7%
Review defensive decisions
Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.79
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.79
- Drive Parry: profile 1.7 · reference 1.92
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.22
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 13, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Zangief: 17 wins in 22 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Zangief: 17 wins in 22 games
- vs Luke: 6 wins in 16 games
- vs JP: 7 wins in 14 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 13, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free