Latest game
DefeatRanked
KE
CAKEUpdated 6 hours ago
CrossPlatform
United KingdomClub · DamedameM100%
CrossPlatformUnited KingdomClub · DamedameM100%Sim4
Let's Do This
LP 22,406Last 106–4Last 2010–10
Winrate
46%
16W · 19L · 35 stored
Ranked matches
35
selected mode
Wins
16
Ranked
Losses
19
Ranked
Peak LP
22,508
Ken
Ranked LP · Ken
League points over time for this character
Replay not requested
KECAPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Ken
Benchmark refreshed Sep 11, 2026, 7:22 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
KELargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | Sim4 | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Arts | 53.2% | 14.9% | +38.3% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 0.2% | 38.2% | -38.0% | |
| SA2 | 4.8% | 25.9% | -21.1% | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 12.9% | 1.4% | +11.5% | |
| SA3 | 46.8% | 35.8% | +11.0% | |
| SA1 | 37.3% | 27.3% | +10.0% | |
| Corner pressure | 6.50 | 13.12 | -6.62 | |
| Drive Guard | 9.5% | 12.7% | -3.3% | |
| Drive Impact | 1.50 | 0.19 | +1.31 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 1.10 | 0.08 | +1.02 | |
| Time cornered | 8.00 | 8.95 | -0.95 | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.00 | 0.84 | -0.84 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.90 | 0.10 | +0.80 | |
| Drive Parry | 1.40 | 1.89 | -0.49 | |
| Got thrown | 1.90 | 2.26 | -0.36 | |
| Throw techs | 0.10 | 0.44 | -0.34 | |
| Throws | 2.30 | 2.57 | -0.27 | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 6.5% | 6.8% | -0.3% | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.00 | 0.23 | -0.23 | |
| Throw parries | 0.30 | 0.21 | +0.09 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.00 | 0.07 | -0.07 | |
| CA | 11.1% | 11.0% | +0.1% | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.05 | +0.05 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ken · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.9 · reference 0.1
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.9 · reference 0.1
- Got Punish Countered: profile 1.1 · reference 0.08
Give each meter spend a purpose
Drive Arts: profile 53.2% · reference 14.9%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- Drive Arts: profile 53.2% · reference 14.9%
Review defensive decisions
Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.23
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.23
- Perfect Parry: profile 0 · reference 0.84
- Drive Parry: profile 1.4 · reference 1.89
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 14, 2026 · AI: nex-agi/nex-n2.5-mini:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Char 253: 202 wins in 467 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Char 253: 202 wins in 467 games
- vs Akuma: 21 wins in 46 games
- vs Ryu: 18 wins in 45 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 16 wins in 35 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 16 wins in 35 games
Look for a repeatable punish opportunity
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.9 · reference 0.1
Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.
Try thisTest one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.9 · reference 0.1
- Got Punish Countered: profile 1.1 · reference 0.08
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 14, 2026 · AI: nex-agi/nex-n2.5-mini:free