1111

What to improve

1. 01

   Review close-range choices

   Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59

   Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.

   Try this

   Replay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.

   Supporting stats

   • Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59
   • Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.49
   • Got thrown: profile 2.8 · reference 2.31
2. 02

   Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice

   Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19

   Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.

   Try this

   Record Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.

   Supporting stats

   • Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
   • Drive Impact gauge: profile 2% · reference 1.4%
3. 03

   Review defensive decisions

   Drive Parry: profile 1.9 · reference 1.96

   Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.

   Try this

   Record two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.

   Supporting stats

   • Drive Parry: profile 1.9 · reference 1.96
   • Perfect Parry: profile 0.7 · reference 0.74
   • Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24

AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.

Data saved Sep 3, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

How to beat this player

1. 01

   Test the close-range pattern

   Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59

   Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.

   Try this

   If the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.

   Supporting stats

   • Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59
   • Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.49
   • Got thrown: profile 2.8 · reference 2.31
2. 02

   Test the Drive Impact tendency

   Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19

   Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.

   Try this

   Revisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.

   Supporting stats

   • Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
   • Drive Impact gauge: profile 2% · reference 1.4%
3. 03

   Probe defense before committing

   Drive Parry: profile 1.9 · reference 1.96

   Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.

   Try this

   Try your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.

   Supporting stats

   • Drive Parry: profile 1.9 · reference 1.96
   • Perfect Parry: profile 0.7 · reference 0.74
   • Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24

AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.

Data saved Sep 3, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free