Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Luke · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.2 · reference 0.08
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 3.6 · reference 1.8
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 3.6 · reference 1.8
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.7 · reference 0.69
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA3: profile 54.8% · reference 34.2%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA3: profile 54.8% · reference 34.2%
- CA: profile 19.2% · reference 9.2%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Luke: 22 wins in 50 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Luke: 22 wins in 50 games
Probe defense before committing
Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.2
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.2
- Throw techs: profile 1.1 · reference 0.37
Build pressure without overextending
Time cornered: profile 10.4 · reference 8.74
Look for chances to gain space with familiar options. Once the opponent is cornered, observe how they actually try to leave before selecting an adjustment.
Try thisTest one pressure sequence you know well. If an escape repeats, rehearse an answer to that exact option; if they vary their defense, avoid committing to a single read.
Supporting stats
- Time cornered: profile 10.4 · reference 8.74
- Corner pressure: profile 8.1 · reference 13.55
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

