Latest game
VictoryRanked
YA
IN
CAUpdated 6 days ago
Steam
JapanM100%
SteamJapanM100%しろたま
Let's Do This
MR 1,500#245,734Last 106–4Last 2013–7
Winrate
52%
23W · 21L · 44 stored
Ranked matches
44
selected mode
Wins
23
Ranked
Losses
21
Ranked
Peak MR
1,500
Cammy
Ranked MR · Cammy
0 local · 0 imported · 0 on chart · 44 battles stored
Not enough ranked MR points in this range yet.
Replay not requested
YAINPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Cammy
Benchmark refreshed Sep 3, 2026, 10:17 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
CALargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | しろたま | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA1 | 17.7% | 43.6% | -25.8% | |
| Drive Arts | 34.5% | 16.8% | +17.7% | |
| CA | 25.3% | 9.3% | +16.0% | |
| SA2 | 31.6% | 16.0% | +15.7% | |
| Drive Guard | 1.4% | 10.1% | -8.7% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 33.4% | 40.7% | -7.4% | |
| SA3 | 25.3% | 31.2% | -5.9% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 0.2% | 5.2% | -5.0% | |
| Throws | 3.90 | 2.43 | +1.47 | |
| Drive Parry | 0.30 | 1.56 | -1.26 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 2.2% | 1.3% | +0.9% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.00 | 0.54 | -0.54 | |
| Time cornered | 9.20 | 8.80 | +0.40 | |
| Corner pressure | 12.60 | 12.91 | -0.31 | |
| Throw techs | 0.10 | 0.35 | -0.25 | |
| Got thrown | 1.90 | 2.13 | -0.23 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.00 | 0.18 | -0.18 | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.20 | 0.06 | +0.14 | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.04 | +0.06 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.20 | 0.16 | +0.04 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.07 | +0.03 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.10 | 0.09 | +0.01 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Yasmine · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Perfect Parry: profile 0 · reference 0.74
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Perfect Parry: profile 0 · reference 0.74
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24
- Drive Parry: profile 0.3 · reference 1.96
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 3.9 · reference 2.59
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.9 · reference 2.59
- Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.49
- Got thrown: profile 1.9 · reference 2.31
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 2.2% · reference 1.4%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Char 253: 123 wins in 270 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Char 253: 123 wins in 270 games
- vs Ryu: 11 wins in 30 games
- vs Cammy: 14 wins in 21 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 23 wins in 44 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 23 wins in 44 games
Look for a repeatable punish opportunity
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.
Try thisTest one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
Cammy · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 0.3 · reference 1.56
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 0.3 · reference 1.56
- Perfect Parry: profile 0 · reference 0.54
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.18
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 3.9 · reference 2.43
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.9 · reference 2.43
- Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.35
- Got thrown: profile 1.9 · reference 2.13
Give each meter spend a purpose
Drive Arts: profile 34.5% · reference 16.8%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- Drive Arts: profile 34.5% · reference 16.8%
- SA2: profile 31.6% · reference 16%
- CA: profile 25.3% · reference 9.3%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Look for a repeatable punish opportunity
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.
Try thisTest one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.06
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 2.2% · reference 1.3%
Build pressure without overextending
Corner pressure: profile 12.6 · reference 12.91
Look for chances to gain space with familiar options. Once the opponent is cornered, observe how they actually try to leave before selecting an adjustment.
Try thisTest one pressure sequence you know well. If an escape repeats, rehearse an answer to that exact option; if they vary their defense, avoid committing to a single read.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 12.6 · reference 12.91
- Time cornered: profile 9.2 · reference 8.8
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free