Latest game
KEsohi_YT
Ranked MR · Ken
14 local · 0 imported · 14 on chart · 14 battles stored
Playstyle reference
Habits vs top — Ken
Loading Ken…
Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ken · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.11
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.11
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.18
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.18
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 6.2% · reference 1.3%
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA1: profile 48% · reference 26.5%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA1: profile 48% · reference 26.5%
- SA2: profile 17% · reference 25%
- SA3: profile 28% · reference 37.5%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 5, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Char 253: 189 wins in 367 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Char 253: 189 wins in 367 games
- vs Juri: 38 wins in 65 games
- vs Alex: 13 wins in 33 games
Look for a repeatable punish opportunity
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.11
Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.
Try thisTest one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.11
Probe defense before committing
Perfect Parry: profile 0.4 · reference 0.79
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.4 · reference 0.79
- Drive Parry: profile 2.2 · reference 1.97
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.21
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 5, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
M. Bison · Latest 100
What to improve
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.18
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.18
Find the cause of punish events
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.09
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.3 · reference 0.09
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.3 · reference 0.07
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA1: profile 48% · reference 30.3%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA1: profile 48% · reference 30.3%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 5, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Terry: 9 wins in 18 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Terry: 9 wins in 18 games
- vs Char 253: 331 wins in 646 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 5, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

