Latest game
VictoryRanked
ZA
CHZAUpdated 5 days ago
Steam
JapanClub · MongiM100%
SteamJapanClub · MongiM100%menbo_9
Pizza Time
MR 1,791#12,105Last 106–4+16Last 2011–9+17
Winrate
49%
73W · 75L · 148 stored
Ranked matches
148
selected mode
Wins
73
Ranked
Losses
75
Ranked
Peak MR
1,852
Zangief
Ranked MR · Zangief
148 local · 0 imported · 148 on chart · 150 battles stored
Replay not requested
ZACHPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Zangief
Benchmark refreshed Sep 3, 2026, 1:20 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
ZALargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | menbo_9 | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA3 | 38.8% | 30.6% | +8.2% | |
| SA1 | 13.4% | 21.1% | -7.7% | |
| Drive Guard | 10.8% | 14.6% | -3.8% | |
| Drive Arts | 10.6% | 12.9% | -2.3% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 6.0% | 7.9% | -1.9% | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 3.0% | 2.1% | +0.9% | |
| SA2 | 35.8% | 36.6% | -0.8% | |
| Corner pressure | 6.10 | 6.66 | -0.56 | |
| Throw techs | 1.10 | 0.57 | +0.53 | |
| Drive Parry | 1.60 | 2.09 | -0.49 | |
| Time cornered | 10.70 | 10.28 | +0.42 | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 35.6% | 35.2% | +0.3% | |
| Got thrown | 2.60 | 2.32 | +0.28 | |
| CA | 11.9% | 11.7% | +0.3% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.27 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.20 | 0.42 | -0.22 | |
| Throws | 2.30 | 2.51 | -0.21 | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.20 | 0.13 | +0.07 | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.07 | +0.03 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.08 | +0.02 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.20 | 0.19 | +0.01 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Zangief · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.13
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.13
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.27
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.27
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 2.9% · reference 2.1%
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.57
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.57
- Got thrown: profile 2.4 · reference 2.32
- Throws: profile 2.3 · reference 2.51
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Char 253: 385 wins in 699 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Char 253: 385 wins in 699 games
- vs Yasmine: 66 wins in 103 games
- vs Terry: 47 wins in 75 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 50 wins in 100 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 50 wins in 100 games
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.27
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.27
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free