Latest game
DefeatRanked
C.
JPC.Updated 7 days ago
Steam
JapanC100%
SteamJapanC100%もちもちのかぶとむし
Fledgling
MR 1,539#148,001Last 102–8-46Last 209–11-11
Winrate
52%
34W · 31L · 65 stored
Ranked matches
65
selected mode
Wins
34
Ranked
Losses
31
Ranked
Peak MR
1,539
C. Viper
Ranked MR · C. Viper
65 local · 0 imported · 65 on chart · 65 battles stored
Replay not requested
C.JPPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 C. Viper
Benchmark refreshed Sep 14, 2026, 1:28 AM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
C.Largest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | もちもちのかぶとむし | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA2 | 37.9% | 22.2% | +15.7% | |
| SA1 | 27.6% | 40.4% | -12.8% | |
| Drive Arts | 9.8% | 22.2% | -12.4% | |
| Drive Guard | 7.9% | 14.7% | -6.7% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 2.3% | 7.3% | -5.0% | |
| Corner pressure | 6.30 | 10.80 | -4.50 | |
| SA3 | 25.9% | 29.7% | -3.8% | |
| Time cornered | 11.60 | 8.60 | +3.00 | |
| Got thrown | 3.50 | 2.20 | +1.30 | |
| Throws | 1.10 | 2.29 | -1.19 | |
| CA | 8.6% | 7.7% | +0.9% | |
| Drive Parry | 1.10 | 1.55 | -0.45 | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 17.7% | 18.1% | -0.4% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.30 | 0.71 | -0.41 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 1.9% | 1.7% | +0.2% | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.21 | -0.11 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.08 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.10 | 0.17 | -0.07 | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.03 | +0.07 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.20 | 0.24 | -0.04 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.07 | +0.03 | |
| Throw techs | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.10 | 0.10 | +0.00 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
C. Viper · Latest 100
What to improve
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 1.1 · reference 2.28
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 1.1 · reference 2.28
- Got thrown: profile 3.5 · reference 2.19
- Throw techs: profile 0.5 · reference 0.47
Review defensive decisions
Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.28
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.28
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA2: profile 37.9% · reference 21.5%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA2: profile 37.9% · reference 21.5%
- SA1: profile 27.6% · reference 45%
- Drive Arts: profile 9.8% · reference 23.2%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Look for a repeatable punish opportunity
Got Punish Countered: profile 0 · reference 0.07
Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.
Try thisTest one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0 · reference 0.07
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.16
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.9% · reference 1.8%
Build pressure without overextending
Corner pressure: profile 6.3 · reference 11.07
Look for chances to gain space with familiar options. Once the opponent is cornered, observe how they actually try to leave before selecting an adjustment.
Try thisTest one pressure sequence you know well. If an escape repeats, rehearse an answer to that exact option; if they vary their defense, avoid committing to a single read.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 6.3 · reference 11.07
- Time cornered: profile 11.6 · reference 8.66
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free