Latest game
DefeatRanked
ZA
AKZAUpdated 1 week ago
CrossPlatform
JapanC100%
CrossPlatformJapanC100%ワンワン
Let's Do This
LP 18,599Last 107–3Last 2012–8
Winrate
50%
58W · 58L · 116 stored
Ranked matches
116
selected mode
Wins
58
Ranked
Losses
58
Ranked
Peak LP
18,898
Zangief
Ranked LP · Zangief
League points over time for this character
Replay not requested
ZAAKPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Zangief
Benchmark refreshed Sep 3, 2026, 1:20 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
ZALargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | ワンワン | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 0.0% | 35.2% | -35.2% | |
| SA2 | 4.4% | 36.6% | -32.2% | |
| SA3 | 60.0% | 30.6% | +29.4% | |
| CA | 33.3% | 11.7% | +21.7% | |
| SA1 | 2.2% | 21.1% | -18.9% | |
| Drive Arts | 28.5% | 12.9% | +15.7% | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 12.2% | 2.1% | +10.0% | |
| Corner pressure | 4.30 | 6.66 | -2.36 | |
| Drive Guard | 12.5% | 14.6% | -2.1% | |
| Drive Parry | 0.80 | 2.09 | -1.29 | |
| Time cornered | 9.00 | 10.28 | -1.28 | |
| Throws | 3.70 | 2.51 | +1.19 | |
| Drive Impact | 1.00 | 0.27 | +0.73 | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.10 | 0.77 | -0.67 | |
| Got thrown | 2.90 | 2.32 | +0.58 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.60 | 0.13 | +0.47 | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 8.4% | 7.9% | +0.5% | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.00 | 0.42 | -0.42 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.50 | 0.19 | +0.31 | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.08 | |
| Throw techs | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 | |
| Got stunned | 0.00 | 0.07 | -0.07 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Zangief · Latest 100
What to improve
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 1 · reference 0.27
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 1 · reference 0.27
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 12.2% · reference 2.1%
Find the cause of punish events
Punish Counters landed: profile 0.5 · reference 0.19
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.5 · reference 0.19
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.6 · reference 0.13
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA3: profile 60% · reference 30.6%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA3: profile 60% · reference 30.6%
- CA: profile 33.3% · reference 11.7%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs JP: 4 wins in 18 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs JP: 4 wins in 18 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 46 wins in 100 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 46 wins in 100 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free