Latest game
VictoryRanked
JA
AKJAUpdated 1 day ago
Steam
OtherClub · NekketsuC100%
SteamOtherClub · NekketsuC100%黒毛和牛上塩タン680円
Let's Do This
MR 1,619#63,324Last 102–8-47Last 205–15-78
Winrate
39%
35W · 55L · 90 stored
Ranked matches
90
selected mode
Wins
35
Ranked
Losses
55
Ranked
Peak MR
1,705
Jamie
Ranked MR · Jamie
45 local · 0 imported · 45 on chart · 139 battles stored
Replay not requested
JAAKPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Jamie
Benchmark refreshed Sep 13, 2026, 4:16 AM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
JALargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | 黒毛和牛上塩タン680円 | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA2 | 6.7% | 21.4% | -14.7% | |
| SA1 | 38.3% | 29.0% | +9.3% | |
| Corner pressure | 8.70 | 14.89 | -6.19 | |
| Drive Guard | 15.9% | 11.0% | +4.9% | |
| Drive Arts | 19.3% | 23.2% | -4.0% | |
| SA3 | 43.3% | 39.7% | +3.6% | |
| CA | 11.7% | 9.8% | +1.8% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 32.3% | 33.8% | -1.5% | |
| Time cornered | 7.10 | 8.56 | -1.46 | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 7.2% | 5.7% | +1.4% | |
| Drive Parry | 3.20 | 1.78 | +1.42 | |
| Got thrown | 2.60 | 2.15 | +0.45 | |
| Throw techs | 0.20 | 0.40 | -0.20 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.10 | 0.26 | -0.16 | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.80 | 0.67 | +0.13 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.20 | 0.07 | +0.13 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 1.3% | 1.4% | -0.1% | |
| Throws | 2.50 | 2.40 | +0.10 | |
| Throw parries | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.08 | |
| Got stunned | 0.00 | 0.06 | -0.06 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.10 | 0.06 | +0.04 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.01 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Jamie · Latest 100
What to improve
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 0.3 · reference 0.42
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 0.3 · reference 0.42
- Got thrown: profile 1.8 · reference 1.97
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 2.2 · reference 1.7
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 2.2 · reference 1.7
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.7 · reference 0.6
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 12.7 · reference 14.71
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 12.7 · reference 14.71
- Time cornered: profile 8.6 · reference 7.67
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Probe defense before committing
Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0 · reference 0.24
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.2
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 0.9% · reference 1.5%
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Ryu: 44 wins in 75 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Ryu: 44 wins in 75 games
- vs Luke: 33 wins in 81 games
- vs Kimberly: 15 wins in 25 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free