Latest game
DefeatRanked
JP
CAJPUpdated 6 days ago
Steam
JapanC100%
SteamJapanC100%座敷犬（ポメラニアン）
Let's Do This
MR 1,555#128,140Last 103–7-23Last 2010–10+9
Winrate
48%
29W · 31L · 60 stored
Ranked matches
60
selected mode
Wins
29
Ranked
Losses
31
Ranked
Peak MR
1,587
JP
Ranked MR · JP
60 local · 0 imported · 60 on chart · 112 battles stored
Replay not requested
JPCAPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 JP
Benchmark refreshed Sep 3, 2026, 4:26 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
JPLargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | 座敷犬（ポメラニアン） | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA2 | 75.0% | 56.6% | +18.4% | |
| SA3 | 6.8% | 19.2% | -12.4% | |
| SA1 | 12.5% | 19.2% | -6.7% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 17.5% | 23.1% | -5.6% | |
| Time cornered | 14.40 | 12.04 | +2.36 | |
| Corner pressure | 8.70 | 10.77 | -2.07 | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 7.9% | 6.5% | +1.4% | |
| Drive Arts | 31.3% | 32.1% | -0.9% | |
| Drive Parry | 1.30 | 2.07 | -0.77 | |
| CA | 5.7% | 5.0% | +0.7% | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.20 | 0.79 | -0.59 | |
| Drive Guard | 13.3% | 12.8% | +0.5% | |
| Throws | 2.30 | 1.97 | +0.33 | |
| Throw techs | 0.60 | 0.39 | +0.21 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 2.3% | 2.1% | +0.2% | |
| Stuns landed | 0.00 | 0.09 | -0.09 | |
| Got thrown | 2.20 | 2.13 | +0.07 | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.04 | +0.06 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.06 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.10 | 0.13 | -0.03 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.10 | 0.13 | -0.03 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.10 | 0.08 | +0.02 | |
| Throw parries | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
JP · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Perfect Parry: profile 0.2 · reference 0.79
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.2 · reference 0.79
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.1 · reference 0.13
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA2: profile 75% · reference 56.6%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA2: profile 75% · reference 56.6%
- SA3: profile 6.8% · reference 19.2%
- SA1: profile 12.5% · reference 19.2%
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 8.7 · reference 10.77
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 8.7 · reference 10.77
- Time cornered: profile 14.4 · reference 12.04
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 9, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Yasmine: 25 wins in 54 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Yasmine: 25 wins in 54 games
- vs Alex: 27 wins in 41 games
- vs Ken: 19 wins in 39 games
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.34
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.4 · reference 0.34
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 2.3% · reference 2.1%
Test the close-range pattern
Throw techs: profile 0.6 · reference 0.39
Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.
Try thisIf the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 0.6 · reference 0.39
- Got thrown: profile 2.2 · reference 2.13
- Throws: profile 2.3 · reference 1.97
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 9, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free