Latest game
VictoryRanked
AL
JAALUpdated 8 hours ago
Steam
JapanC100%
SteamJapanC100%RIKITO(JPN)
GG
MR 1,736#19,430Last 108–2+48Last 2012–8+32
Winrate
56%
28W · 22L · 50 stored
Ranked matches
50
selected mode
Wins
28
Ranked
Losses
22
Ranked
Peak MR
1,737
Alex
Ranked MR · Alex
48 local · 0 imported · 48 on chart · 50 battles stored
Replay not requested
ALJAPlaystyle reference
Habits vs top 30 Alex
Benchmark refreshed Sep 2, 2026, 1:21 PM
Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages. · Data details
ALLargest absolute differences first23 habits
| Habit | RIKITO(JPN) | Legends | Difference | LessLegendsMore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA3 | 42.1% | 22.1% | +20.0% | |
| SA1 | 28.9% | 43.0% | -14.1% | |
| SA2 | 19.7% | 28.4% | -8.6% | |
| Drive Rush (cancel) | 40.8% | 33.0% | +7.7% | |
| Drive Arts | 6.5% | 14.2% | -7.7% | |
| Corner pressure | 4.70 | 9.01 | -4.31 | |
| Time cornered | 13.00 | 9.88 | +3.12 | |
| Drive Guard | 11.4% | 14.1% | -2.7% | |
| CA | 9.2% | 6.5% | +2.7% | |
| Drive Rush (parry) | 6.2% | 8.2% | -2.0% | |
| Throws | 1.40 | 2.32 | -0.92 | |
| Drive Impact gauge | 2.4% | 1.7% | +0.7% | |
| Throw techs | 1.10 | 0.48 | +0.62 | |
| Got thrown | 2.70 | 2.12 | +0.58 | |
| Drive Reversal | 0.70 | 0.47 | +0.23 | |
| Perfect Parry | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.10 | |
| Throw parries | 0.20 | 0.29 | -0.09 | |
| Punish Counters landed | 0.20 | 0.12 | +0.08 | |
| Got Punish Countered | 0.20 | 0.12 | +0.08 | |
| Drive Parry | 1.70 | 1.63 | +0.07 | |
| Got stunned | 0.10 | 0.05 | +0.05 | |
| Stuns landed | 0.10 | 0.07 | +0.03 | |
| Drive Impact | 0.20 | 0.20 | +0.00 |
FROM STATS TO PRACTICE
Latest 100Match plan
Turn this profile’s habits and results into ideas to test. Habits cover all characters; the selected character sets the comparison group.
Checking for a saved match plan…
Uses public profile stats with OpenRouter’s free AI models. Plans are shared and saved for reuse. Suggestions are hypotheses, not replay analysis.Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ken · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.19
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.19
- Drive Parry: profile 3 · reference 1.93
- Perfect Parry: profile 1 · reference 0.8
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.45
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.45
- Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.62
- Got thrown: profile 2.5 · reference 2.26
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 9.4 · reference 12.91
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 9.4 · reference 12.91
- Time cornered: profile 9.8 · reference 8.75
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Sagat: 8 wins in 15 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Sagat: 8 wins in 15 games
- vs Luke: 11 wins in 17 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
Ryu · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.15
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.15
- Drive Parry: profile 3 · reference 1.69
- Perfect Parry: profile 1 · reference 0.71
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.44
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.44
- Got thrown: profile 2.5 · reference 2.06
- Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.2
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.8% · reference 1.1%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Ryu: 2 wins in 10 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Ryu: 2 wins in 10 games
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.8% · reference 1.1%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
Luke · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Got Punish Countered: profile 0.1 · reference 0.06
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0.1 · reference 0.06
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.1 · reference 0.08
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.43
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.43
- Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.37
- Got thrown: profile 2.5 · reference 2.01
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.8% · reference 1.4%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Probe defense before committing
Drive Parry: profile 3 · reference 1.8
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 3 · reference 1.8
- Perfect Parry: profile 1 · reference 0.69
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.5 · reference 0.2
Test the close-range pattern
Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.43
Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.
Try thisIf the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.4 · reference 2.43
- Throw techs: profile 1.2 · reference 0.37
- Got thrown: profile 2.5 · reference 2.01
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.8% · reference 1.4%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 8, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free