Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Ed · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Drive Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 1.77
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 1.77
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.76
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.6 · reference 0.2
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 3.2 · reference 2.6
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.2 · reference 2.6
- Throw techs: profile 0.4 · reference 0.47
- Got thrown: profile 2.3 · reference 2.18
Study a recurring matchup situation
vs Alex: 11 wins in 27 games
Use the cited matchup record to choose footage to review. Look for a repeated decision across several losses, and compare it with a win before drawing a conclusion.
Try thisPick one recurring situation against that character. Recreate it in training, verify an alternative response, and track that decision across the next five matches.
Supporting stats
- vs Alex: 11 wins in 27 games
- vs C. Viper: 4 wins in 12 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 9, 2026 · AI: nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro:free
How to beat this player
Probe defense before committing
Drive Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 1.77
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 1.77
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.76
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.6 · reference 0.2
Test the close-range pattern
Throws: profile 3.2 · reference 2.6
Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.
Try thisIf the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.2 · reference 2.6
- Got thrown: profile 2.3 · reference 2.18
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Alex: 11 wins in 27 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Alex: 11 wins in 27 games
- vs C. Viper: 4 wins in 12 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 9, 2026 · AI: nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro:free

