Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Yasmine · Latest 100
What to improve
Find the cause of punish events
Got Punish Countered: profile 0 · reference 0.06
Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.
Try thisRecreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.
Supporting stats
- Got Punish Countered: profile 0 · reference 0.06
- Punish Counters landed: profile 0.1 · reference 0.09
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA1: profile 9.8% · reference 32.1%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA1: profile 9.8% · reference 32.1%
- SA2: profile 45.1% · reference 21%
- SA3: profile 36.6% · reference 36.9%
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 10.4 · reference 13.62
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 10.4 · reference 13.62
- Time cornered: profile 8.8 · reference 9.38
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.2 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 1.5% · reference 1.4%
Test the close-range pattern
Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59
Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.
Try thisIf the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.6 · reference 2.59
- Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.49
- Got thrown: profile 3.3 · reference 2.31
Probe defense before committing
Drive Parry: profile 1.2 · reference 1.96
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Parry: profile 1.2 · reference 1.96
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.5 · reference 0.74
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.24
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
Cammy · Latest 100
What to improve
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.35
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.35
Give each meter spend a purpose
SA2: profile 45.1% · reference 16%
Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.
Try thisPractice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.
Supporting stats
- SA2: profile 45.1% · reference 16%
Review defensive decisions
Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Test the close-range pattern
Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.35
Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.
Try thisIf the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 0.9 · reference 0.35
Adapt to the visible gauge
SA2: profile 45.1% · reference 16%
Watch current Drive and Super Art resources during the match. Treat the profile’s spending pattern as a question to investigate, not a prediction of burnout or a guaranteed opening.
Try thisAfter a large spend, reassess the options available to both players before approaching. If their resource decisions differ from the profile, follow the live situation.
Supporting stats
- SA2: profile 45.1% · reference 16%
Probe defense before committing
Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
Test one familiar pressure situation and observe the actual response. Use that observation to vary your next choice; do not infer a success rate from event counts.
Try thisTry your usual strike/throw decision in a situation you understand. Repeat only if the response is consistent; if they adapt, vary your timing or reset to neutral.
Supporting stats
- Drive Reversal: profile 0.2 · reference 0.18
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 6, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

