Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Luke · Latest 100
What to improve
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.19
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 0.8% · reference 1.4%
Review close-range choices
Throws: profile 3.1 · reference 2.43
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throws: profile 3.1 · reference 2.43
- Got thrown: profile 2 · reference 2.01
- Throw techs: profile 0.6 · reference 0.37
Trace how you lose or gain space
Corner pressure: profile 10.1 · reference 13.55
Review five trips into the corner. Identify the earlier decision that gave up space, not just the final escape attempt. Check successful corner pressure too.
Try thisRecreate one recurring position in training. Compare your usual response with a less committal alternative, then track whether you reach the corner less often over the next set.
Supporting stats
- Corner pressure: profile 10.1 · reference 13.55
- Time cornered: profile 9.3 · reference 8.74
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs M. Bison: 27 wins in 106 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs M. Bison: 27 wins in 106 games
- vs Alex: 26 wins in 55 games
- vs Akuma: 18 wins in 45 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 19 wins in 33 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 19 wins in 33 games
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.19
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.1 · reference 0.19
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 0.8% · reference 1.4%
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

