What to improve

1. 01

   Find the cause of punish events

   Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.09

   Review five Punish Counters received and five landed. Separate whiffed attacks from unsafe actions on block before choosing what to practice.

   Try this

   Recreate one repeated situation in training. Check the spacing and frame meter, then practice a safer choice or a punish that actually connects.

   Supporting stats

   • Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.09
   • Punish Counters landed: profile 0.2 · reference 0.11
2. 02

   Review defensive decisions

   Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.46

   Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.

   Try this

   Record two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.

   Supporting stats

   • Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.46
   • Perfect Parry: profile 0.2 · reference 0.79
3. 03

   Give each meter spend a purpose

   CA: profile 22.4% · reference 11%

   Review five resource decisions with the actual gauge visible. Note what the spend gained and what options remained; usage shares alone cannot measure efficiency.

   Try this

   Practice a familiar sequence with a resource spend and a conservation alternative. Compare the outcome and remaining gauge before deciding which situation calls for each.

   Supporting stats

   • CA: profile 22.4% · reference 11%
   • SA3: profile 31.3% · reference 37.5%

AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.

Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

How to beat this player

1. 01

   Use matchup records as scouting leads

   vs Ken: 7 wins in 22 games

   A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.

   Try this

   If you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.

   Supporting stats

   • vs Ken: 7 wins in 22 games
2. 02

   Look for a repeatable punish opportunity

   Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.09

   Use the stats as a scouting lead. Watch for an action you have already verified as punishable at that spacing; do not assume every apparent opening is unsafe.

   Try this

   Test one confirmed response when that action appears. If it stops appearing, return to your normal spacing instead of forcing the punish.

   Supporting stats

   • Got Punish Countered: profile 0.2 · reference 0.09
   • Punish Counters landed: profile 0.2 · reference 0.11
3. 03

   Test the close-range pattern

   Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.46

   Observe actual strike, throw and defensive choices at close range. Change one part of your familiar mix only after a tendency appears.

   Try this

   If the same response repeats twice, try a different option in that situation. If the player changes their response, return to varied choices instead of assuming the pattern is permanent.

   Supporting stats

   • Throw techs: profile 0.1 · reference 0.46
   • Got thrown: profile 2 · reference 2.28

AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.

Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free