Saved match plans
Previously generated AI plans, with their original supporting stats and data dates. Expand a plan to read both perspectives.
Cammy · Latest 100
What to improve
Review defensive decisions
Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.54
Compare five defensive situations: what did the opponent do, what did you choose, and what happened? Low parry or throw-tech counts alone do not establish a weakness.
Try thisRecord two different options from one troublesome situation. Practice identifying them and choosing a response, then review whether the same decision improves in your next set.
Supporting stats
- Perfect Parry: profile 0.1 · reference 0.54
- Drive Parry: profile 0.8 · reference 1.56
Make Drive Impact a deliberate choice
Drive Impact: profile 0.3 · reference 0.16
Review five Drive Impacts and record the situation and outcome. Keep effective uses; investigate repeated failures rather than aiming for the reference frequency.
Try thisRecord Drive Impact and an ordinary attack in separate dummy slots. Mix playback and practice recognizing the difference with a response available in your current gauge state.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.3 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 4.7% · reference 1.3%
Review close-range choices
Throw techs: profile 0 · reference 0.35
Look at five close-range exchanges. Separate throw opportunities, throw attempts and defensive choices; the aggregate counts cannot show which option was correct.
Try thisReplay one recurring situation in training with both a strike and a throw recorded. Practice your chosen responses, then check how often you make that choice deliberately in matches.
Supporting stats
- Throw techs: profile 0 · reference 0.35
- Got thrown: profile 1.7 · reference 2.13
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free
How to beat this player
Test the Drive Impact tendency
Drive Impact: profile 0.3 · reference 0.16
Observe whether Drive Impact repeats in a particular situation. Prepare a response you have verified in training, while respecting range, recovery and available gauge.
Try thisRevisit that situation with a less committal approach. If the Impact appears, use your practiced response; if it does not, resume your usual game plan.
Supporting stats
- Drive Impact: profile 0.3 · reference 0.16
- Drive Impact gauge: profile 4.7% · reference 1.3%
Use matchup records as scouting leads
vs Akuma: 55 wins in 92 games
A lower win rate suggests footage to examine, not a guaranteed counterpick. Check whether the same difficult situation appears in multiple matches.
Try thisIf you play the cited character, test one familiar situation from that footage. If the player handles it well, abandon the assumption and adapt to what they show.
Supporting stats
- vs Akuma: 55 wins in 92 games
- vs Ryu: 49 wins in 84 games
Separate a tendency from a one-off event
Recent stored ranked sample: 39 wins in 80 games
Scout several recent matches and compare wins with losses. Prepare around a repeated situation rather than one memorable mistake.
Try thisUse the first round to check one scouting hypothesis. If it repeats, apply your prepared adjustment; if it does not, discard it and observe a new pattern.
Supporting stats
- Recent stored ranked sample: 39 wins in 80 games
AI selects and prioritizes reviewed practice plans from the cited stats. Habits cover the whole profile; character records and recent samples have separate scopes. These are ideas to test, not confirmed weaknesses or video analysis. Latest reported trends across the last 100 matches, not lifetime habit averages.
Data saved Sep 7, 2026 · AI: dots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free

